People v. Bibbes

100 A.D.3d 1473, 954 N.Y.S.2d 923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2012·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

— Motion for reargument of the appeal is granted to the extent that, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered September 28, 2012 (98 AD3d 1267 [2012]) is amended by deleting the first sentence of the fourth paragraph of the memorandum and substituting the following sentence: “We reject defendant’s further contention that Supreme Court erred in permitting a prosecution witness to testify that, on the day after the incident, defendant told her that he would ‘cap [the victim] and her daughter’ because he would not go to jail for a crime he did not commit, and that defendant then pulled up his shirt and revealed ‘like a little gun or something like that in his waist.’ ” Present — Centra, J.E, Eeradotto, Garni, Bindley and Sconiers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bibbes, 100 A.D.3d 1473, 954 N.Y.S.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

100 A.D.3d 1473 (People v. Bibbes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McKoy
2023 NY Slip Op 03119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Lynch
2021 NY Slip Op 00970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Jordan
2020 NY Slip Op 1817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Smith
121 A.D.3d 1568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. James
114 A.D.3d 1202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Case
113 A.D.3d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)