People v. Biaselli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Biaselli

12 A.D.3d 1133, 784 N.Y.S.2d 442

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 12 A.D.3d 1133 (People v. Biaselli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Biaselli, 12 A.D.3d 1133, 784 N.Y.S.2d 442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Orleans County Court (James P Punch, J.), rendered August 25, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual misconduct and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual misconduct (Penal Law § 130.20 [1]) and two counts of endangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10 [1]). The waiver of the right to appeal by defendant encompasses his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see People v McKay, 5 AD3d 1040, 1041 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 803 [2004]). Further, defendant failed to preserve that challenge for review by moving to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v Casco, 4 AD3d 742 [2004]). In any event, the record establishes that defendant’s Alford plea (see North Carolina v Alford, 400 US 25 [1970]) was properly accepted by County Court (see People v Sherman, 8 AD3d 1026, 1026-1027 [2004]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Orleans County Court (James P Punch, J.), rendered August 25, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual misconduct and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual misconduct (Penal Law § 130.20 [1]) and two counts of endangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10 [1]). The waiver of the right to appeal by defendant encompasses his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see People v McKay, 5 AD3d 1040, 1041 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 803 [2004]). Further, defendant failed to preserve that challenge for review by moving to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v Casco, 4 AD3d 742 [2004]). In any event, the record establishes that defendant’s Alford plea (see North Carolina v Alford, 400 US 25 [1970]) was properly accepted by County Court (see People v Sherman, 8 AD3d 1026, 1026-1027 [2004]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.3d 1133, 784 N.Y.S.2d 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-biaselli-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack