People v. Bevier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bevier

216 A.D.2d 404, 628 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D.2d 404 (People v. Bevier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bevier, 216 A.D.2d 404, 628 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered August 26, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contentions that the court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty or in failing to order a hearing before a different Judge (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Lisbon, 187 AD2d 457; People v White, 165 AD2d 820; People v Bell, 141 AD2d 749).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered August 26, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contentions that the court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty or in failing to order a hearing before a different Judge (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Lisbon, 187 AD2d 457; People v White, 165 AD2d 820; People v Bell, 141 AD2d 749).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 404, 628 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bevier-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack