People v. White
This text of 158 A.D.2d 565 (People v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find it legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review any issue of law with respect to his current argument that the court erred in discharging a juror (see, People v McGee, 152 AD2d 601; People v Fernandez, 137 AD2d 709). The defendant also failed to preserve for appellate review his current argument that the court erred in failing to invite him to make a statement prior to the imposition of sentence (see, People v Green, 54 NY2d 878, 880).
We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see also, People v Tirado, 158 AD2d 564 [decided herewith]). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.D.2d 565, 551 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-white-nyappdiv-1990.