People v. Bethune
This text of 91 A.D.3d 966 (People v. Bethune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant contends that the County Court improperly delegated its authority to the prosecutor, who conducted most, of the plea proceeding, thereby rendering his plea involuntary. The [967]*967defendant’s contention is without merit, as the proceeding was conducted in the County Court’s presence and under its supervision, and there is nothing in the record to suggest that the defendant’s plea was made involuntarily (see People v Garbarini, 64 AD3d 1179, 1179-1180 [2009]; People v Smith, 306 AD2d 210 [2003]; People v Montanez, 287 AD2d 407, 408 [2001]; People v Sanchez, 284 AD2d 137 [2001]; People v Anthony, 188 AD2d 477 [1992]; People v Empey, 141 AD2d 987, 988 [1988]). Mastro, A.EJ., Chambers, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.D.3d 966, 937 N.Y.2d 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bethune-nyappdiv-2012.