People v. Anthony
This text of 179 A.D.2d 765 (People v. Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in allowing a police officer to testify that he arrested the defendant after a conversation with the victim (see, People v Holt, 67 NY2d 819, 821; see also, People v DuBois, 137 AD2d 706) is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, any error was harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, including the strong identification testimony by the victim and an eyewitness who was acquainted with the defendant (see, People v Mobley, 56 NY2d 584; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 A.D.2d 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anthony-nyappdiv-1992.