People v. Bethea

290 A.D.2d 226, 735 N.Y.S.2d 750, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 176
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bethea. Read the opinion of the Court — 261 A.D.2d 629

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Sonberg, J.), rendered October 29, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of auto stripping in the second degree, and convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of auto stripping in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s Sandoval ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459; People v Mattiace, 77 NY2d 269, 275-276; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292). Defendant’s theft-related convictions were highly relevant to his credibility (see, People v Post, 235 AD2d 299, lv denied 90 NY2d 862). Concur— Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bethea, 290 A.D.2d 226, 735 N.Y.S.2d 750, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

290 A.D.2d 226 (People v. Bethea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Pavao
451 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Mattiace
568 N.E.2d 1189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Post
235 A.D.2d 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)