People v. Bethea

12 A.D.3d 454, 783 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13302
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 8, 2004·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[455] Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered October 23, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Despite the defendant’s contention to the contrary, he was not deprived of his right to testify before the grand jury as a result of the prosecutor’s interruptions during his grand jury appearance, since the prosecutor simply prevented him from testifying on a variety of topics that were not relevant to the facts of this case or the grand jury’s investigation (see People v Smith, 199 AD2d 348 [1993], affd 84 NY2d 998 [1994]; People v Valvano, 186 AD2d 769 [1992]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bethea, 12 A.D.3d 454, 783 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13302 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

12 A.D.3d 454 (People v. Bethea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Adamson
131 A.D.3d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Meleance
52 A.D.3d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)