People v. Bernard

185 A.D.2d 660, 587 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9197
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bernard. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 A.D.2d 419

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant, by pleading guilty, forfeited his [661]*661right to challenge whether hearsay or bolstering testimony should have been admitted before the Grand Jury (see, People v Campbell, 73 NY2d 481, 486; People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1, 5). Additionally, this court lacks interest-of-justice jurisdiction to review the minimum indeterminate sentence mandated by statute for second felony offenders (People v Clark, 176 AD2d 1206, Iv denied 79 NY2d 854). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.—Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bernard, 185 A.D.2d 660, 587 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9197 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

185 A.D.2d 660 (People v. Bernard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Campbell
539 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Clark
176 A.D.2d 1206 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)