People v. Bentley

227 A.D.2d 411, 642 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4911
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 6, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), rendered December 12, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, and a violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 376, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by revers[412] ing the conviction for the violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 376, vacating the fine imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the record, we find that the defendant voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal the judgment of conviction after a jury trial in exchange for a lesser sentence. Accordingly, he cannot now challenge the propriety of either the prosecutor’s conduct or the court’s charge (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; People v Clark, 223 AD2d 722; People v Brewley, 211 AD2d 805).

That count of the indictment charging a violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 376 must, however, be dismissed as jurisdictionally defective, as the People correctly concede (see, People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589; People v Aponte, 212 AD2d 157). Thompson, J. P., Hart, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bentley, 227 A.D.2d 411, 642 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

227 A.D.2d 411 (People v. Bentley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ray
245 A.D.2d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)