People v. Benson

232 A.D.2d 497, 648 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10145
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), imposed February 14, 1995, as, upon his conviction of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, imposed a mandatory surcharge.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The defendant challenged the court’s refusal to waive the mandatory surcharge imposed as a condition of his sentence. It is well settled that such challenges are premature at the time of sentencing, since the defendant may earn funds while incarcerated from which to pay the surcharge, or upon completion of the sentence the defendant may move to vacate the surcharge upon a showing of indigency (see, People v Velez, 216 AD2d 339; People v West, 124 Misc 2d 622). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Benson, 232 A.D.2d 497, 648 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10145 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

232 A.D.2d 497 (People v. Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hopkins
185 Misc. 2d 312 (New York Supreme Court, 2000)