People v. Benson

203 A.D.2d 966, 611 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5012
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention that the court improperly denied defendant’s request for new counsel to be assigned. The contentions that counsel called defendant names and failed to communicate adequately with him do not amount to a showing of good cause, a conflict of interest or irreconcilable conflict between defendant and counsel (see, People v Lashway, 187 AD2d 747, 749, lv denied 81 NY2d 842).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J. — Robbery, 3rd Degree.) Present— Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Benson, 203 A.D.2d 966, 611 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 966 (People v. Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hickey
2019 NY Slip Op 3165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Appleby
295 A.D.2d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Holloman
291 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)