Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Bennett

People v. Bennett

102 A.D.3d 881, 957 N.Y.S.2d 905
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 23, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.3d 881 (People v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bennett, 102 A.D.3d 881, 957 N.Y.S.2d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Foley, J.), both imposed November 8, 2010, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waivers of his right to appeal preclude review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Santos, 98 AD3d 590 [2012]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Santos
98 A.D.3d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A.D.3d 881, 957 N.Y.S.2d 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bennett-nyappdiv-2013.