People v. Bennett

102 A.D.3d 881, 957 N.Y.S.2d 905
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 2013·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Foley, J.), both imposed November 8, 2010, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waivers of his right to appeal preclude review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Santos, 98 AD3d 590 [2012]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bennett, 102 A.D.3d 881, 957 N.Y.S.2d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

102 A.D.3d 881 (People v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rance
122 A.D.3d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Corbin
121 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Mackey
109 A.D.3d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)