People v. Belgrave

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Belgrave

209 A.D.2d 629, 619 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11477

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 21, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from the judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered July 1, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that expert testimony was im[630]*630properly admitted is unpreserved for appellate review and there is no basis to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 250).

The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from the judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered July 1, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that expert testimony was im[630]*630properly admitted is unpreserved for appellate review and there is no basis to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 250).

The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

People v. Belgrave, 209 A.D.2d 629, 619 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

209 A.D.2d 629 (People v. Belgrave) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related