People v. Behm

216 N.W.2d 631, 52 Mich. App. 119, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 998
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 7, 1974
DocketDocket Nos. 13292, 13294, 13331
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 N.W.2d 631 (People v. Behm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Behm, 216 N.W.2d 631, 52 Mich. App. 119, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 998 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to an order of the Supreme Court dated December 27, 1973, in People v Whitehead, Behm, Patterson, No’s. 54942-3-4 (391 Mich 752), we have reviewed our decision in these cases as it appears, in 45 Mich App 614; 207 NW2d 200 (1973), in the light of People v Adams, 389 Mich 222; 205 NW2d 415 (1973).

This review establishes that the trial court failed to instruct the jury on asportation as mandated by Adams, supra. This failure compels reversal of defendants’ convictions for kidnapping.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Behm
216 N.W.2d 631 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 N.W.2d 631, 52 Mich. App. 119, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-behm-michctapp-1974.