People v. Beckwith
303 A.D.2d 1054, 759 N.Y.S.2d 923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2003·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
—Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the fourth sentence of the first paragraph of the memorandum (289 AD2d 956 [2001]) is deleted and the following sentence is substituted in its place: “Although the caseworker was called as a witness at trial, she was not a witness before the grand jury (see People v Litzenberger, 234 AD2d 947, 948 [1996];. cf. People v Sayavong, 83 NY2d 702 [1994]).” Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe, and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Beckwith, 303 A.D.2d 1054, 759 N.Y.S.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).
303 A.D.2d 1054 (People v. Beckwith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Alexander
109 A.D.3d 1083 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)