People v. Beckwith

270 A.D.2d 798, 705 N.Y.S.2d 315, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3400
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2000·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Judgment modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Upon defendant’s conviction of criminal trespass in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.15) and criminal mischief in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 145.00 [1]), County Court imposed consecutive definite sentences of imprisonment of one year and six months. Because those offenses were committed as part of a single incident, imposition of consecutive sentences aggregating more than one year is illegal (see, Penal Law § 70.25 [3]; People v Silvagnio, 79 AD2d 1112). We therefore modify the judgment by providing that the sentences shall run concurrently.

[799]*799All concur, Callahan, J., not participating. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Criminal Trespass, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Beckwith, 270 A.D.2d 798, 705 N.Y.S.2d 315, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 798 (People v. Beckwith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ORTH, MICHAEL, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Orth
125 A.D.3d 1474 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Shutter
72 A.D.3d 1211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)