People v. Beckstead

2020 NY Slip Op 4670, 127 N.Y.S.3d 356, 186 A.D.3d 1068
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 20, 2020
Docket399 KA 19-00884
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 4670 (People v. Beckstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Beckstead, 2020 NY Slip Op 4670, 127 N.Y.S.3d 356, 186 A.D.3d 1068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Beckstead (2020 NY Slip Op 04670)
People v Beckstead
2020 NY Slip Op 04670
Decided on August 20, 2020
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 20, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

399 KA 19-00884

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

TAYLOR I. BECKSTEAD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


CAITLIN M. CONNELLY, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

KRISTYNA S. MILLS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WATERTOWN, FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Jefferson County Court (Kim H. Martusewicz, J.), rendered December 12, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon her plea of guilty of burglary in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law

§ 140.30 [2]). We affirm.

Initially, we emphasize once again that, "[c]ontrary to the People's contention, and as we have previously noted, it is well settled that this Court's sentence-review power may be exercised, if the interest of justice warrants, without deference to the sentencing court . . . , and that we may substitute our own discretion for that of a trial court which has not abused its discretion in the imposition of a sentence" (People v White, 153 AD3d 1565, 1568 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 1065 [2017] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Nevertheless, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: August 20, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. White
2017 NY Slip Op 6735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Bolt v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.
91 N.E.3d 1234 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 4670, 127 N.Y.S.3d 356, 186 A.D.3d 1068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-beckstead-nyappdiv-2020.