People v. Beck
This text of 191 A.D.2d 1031 (People v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s argument that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 708-709). We also reject his argument that the court erred in ordering the amount of restitution recommended in the probation report without conducting a hearing. Defendant concedes that the proof at trial established that the victim’s unreimbursed loss was $6,100, and thus we conclude that a hearing was unnecessary (see, People v King, 158 AD2d 972, lv denied 76 NY2d 737; People v Welsher, 154 AD2d 915, 916, lv denied 74 NY2d 952; cf., People v Guise, 179 AD2d 1027, lv denied 79 NY2d 1001; People v Vella, 176 AD2d 768, lv denied 79 NY2d 833; People v Clougher, 95 AD2d 860). Defendant was ordered to pay restitu[1032]*1032tion of $3,500 plus a $175 surcharge, an amount less than that established by the record (cf., People v Ramirez, 98 AD2d 985). (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Kelly, J. — Grand Larceny, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 A.D.2d 1031, 595 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-beck-nyappdiv-1993.