People v. Ramirez

92 A.D.2d 1030, 460 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17432

This text of 92 A.D.2d 1030 (People v. Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ramirez, 92 A.D.2d 1030, 460 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17432 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Motion by Robert J. Krzys, Esq., for reconsideration or renewal of determinations made by Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney denying applications for orders increasing the amounts of compensation allowed by the Trial Judge for services as assigned counsel for defendants, or, in the alternative, for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Motion dismissed on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction to review the challenged determinations (Matter of Werfel v Agresta, 36 NY2d 624) or to grant permission to appeal. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Main, Casey and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Werfel v. Agresta
331 N.E.2d 668 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.2d 1030, 460 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ramirez-nyappdiv-1983.