People v. Beauzay
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 3203 (People v. Beauzay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), entered March 16, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the People presented clear and convincing evidence of aggravating factors not adequately taken into account by the Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary (2006) which tend to establish a higher likelihood of reof-fense or danger to the community (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]; People V Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 121 [2011]). Upon making such a determination, the court providently exercised its discretion in granting the People’s application for an upward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d at 861; People v Widom, 143 AD3d 688 [2016]; People v DeDona, 102 AD3d 58, 68-69 [2012]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d at 123). Accordingly, the defendant was properly designated a level two sex offender.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 3203, 149 A.D.3d 1113, 50 N.Y.S.3d 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-beauzay-nyappdiv-2017.