People v. Beaman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Beaman

155 A.D.2d 375, 548 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14566

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 28, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.D.2d 375 (People v. Beaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Beaman, 155 A.D.2d 375, 548 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Carey, J.), rendered February 2, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 2 to 4 years and IVi to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claims of prosecutorial misconduct were not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to reach these matters which, upon timely and proper objection, could have been cured. (See, People v Tardbania, 72 NY2d 852.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Carey, J.), rendered February 2, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 2 to 4 years and IVi to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claims of prosecutorial misconduct were not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to reach these matters which, upon timely and proper objection, could have been cured. (See, People v Tardbania, 72 NY2d 852.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 A.D.2d 375, 548 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-beaman-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack