People v. Baucom

220 A.D.2d 678, 632 N.Y.S.2d 975, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10519

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered May 17, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that he was denied a fair trial by the court’s reasonable doubt charge (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858; People v Brown, 204 AD2d 734). In any event, a review of the charge demonstrates that it adequately illustrated the concept of reasonable doubt to the jury (see, People v Canty, 60 NY2d 830; People v Russell, 266 NY 147; People v Rosa, 162 AD2d 257; see also, 1 CJI[NY] 3.06, 3.07, 6.20). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Baucom, 220 A.D.2d 678, 632 N.Y.S.2d 975, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10519 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

220 A.D.2d 678 (People v. Baucom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Russell
194 N.E. 65 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
People v. Canty
457 N.E.2d 800 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bynum
518 N.E.2d 4 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Rosa
162 A.D.2d 257 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Brown
204 A.D.2d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)