People v. Baucom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Baucom

210 A.D.2d 242, 620 N.Y.S.2d 261

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 5, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered August 11, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a hypodermic needle, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for an adjournment at sentencing (see, Matter of Anthony M., 63 NY2d 270; People v Singleton, 41 NY2d 402). Thompson, J. P., Miller, O’Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered August 11, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a hypodermic needle, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for an adjournment at sentencing (see, Matter of Anthony M., 63 NY2d 270; People v Singleton, 41 NY2d 402). Thompson, J. P., Miller, O’Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

People v. Baucom, 210 A.D.2d 242, 620 N.Y.S.2d 261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

210 A.D.2d 242 (People v. Baucom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related