People v. Baucom
This text of 210 A.D.2d 242 (People v. Baucom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered August 11, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a hypodermic needle, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for an adjournment at sentencing (see, Matter of Anthony M., 63 NY2d 270; People v Singleton, 41 NY2d 402). Thompson, J. P., Miller, O’Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
210 A.D.2d 242, 620 N.Y.S.2d 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-baucom-nyappdiv-1994.