People v. Barksdale

131 A.D.3d 704, 15 N.Y.S.3d 693
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 26, 2015·No. 2014-01536·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), imposed January 28, 2014, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Barksdale, 131 A.D.3d 704, 15 N.Y.S.3d 693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

131 A.D.3d 704 (People v. Barksdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ritorto
2016 NY Slip Op 7681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Elias
2016 NY Slip Op 6838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Hunter
139 A.D.3d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)