People v. Barajas
This text of 513 N.W.2d 772 (People v. Barajas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Memorandum Opinion. The defendant was convicted of conspiracy to possess 650 or more grams of a mixture containing cocaine. MCL 750.157a, 333.7403(2)(a)(i); MSA 28.354(1), 14.15(7403)(2)(a)(i). He was then sentenced to a life term of imprisonment.
The defendant attempted to purchase a large amount of cocaine, but the seller evidently intended to cheat him. Thus, the seller delivered a much smaller amount of cocaine in a package that was physically arranged to create the illusion of a larger amount. One feature of the package was that the small amount of cocaine was kept separate from a much larger quantity of baking soda.
The Court of Appeals reversed the defendant’s conviction because there was insufficient evidence of conspiracy (it was not proven that the seller ever intended to provide the promised amount), and because the separately packaged cocaine and baking soda did not constitute a "mixture.”1 198 Mich App 551, 558; 499 NW2d 396 (1993). The prosecutor appeals.2
We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals. MCR 7.302(F)(1). However, we emphasize that the analysis employed by the Court of Appeals is limited strictly to the facts of this case._
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
513 N.W.2d 772, 444 Mich. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-barajas-mich-1994.