People v. Baker

62 A.D.3d 809, 877 N.Y.S.2d 913
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 12, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), imposed April 8, 2008, as, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, directed him to register with the New York City Police Department as a gun offender pursuant to the Gun Offender Registration Act (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 10-601 et seq.) and comply with the further requirements of the Gun Offender Registration Act, in effect, as a condition of his probation.

Ordered that the sentence is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and that portion of the sentence which directed the defendant to register with the New York City Police Department as a gun offender pursuant to the Gun Offender Registration Act and comply with the further requirements of the Gun Offender Registration Act, in effect, as a condition of his probation, is vacated.

[810]*810New York City’s Gun Offender Registration Act (hereinafter GORA) imposes certain registration and reporting requirements on persons convicted in the courts of the City of New York of a “gun offense” (Local Law No. 29 [2006] of City of NY § 1). GORA defines a “gun offender” as:

“any person who is convicted, after the effective date of this act, of a gun offense as defined in subdivision e of this section in a court in the city of New York . . .

“e. ‘Gun offense’ shall mean a conviction of. . . criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree in violation of subdivision 3 of section 265.03 of the penal law” (Administrative Code of City of NY § 10-602 [d], [e] [emphasis added]).

The defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under Penal Law § 265.03 (1) (b). As the defendant contends, and the People correctly concede, GORA does not apply to the defendant, inasmuch as he was not convicted of a “gun offense” as defined in the Administrative Code of the City of New York. Miller, J.P., Angiolillo, Eng and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Baker, 62 A.D.3d 809, 877 N.Y.S.2d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

62 A.D.3d 809 (People v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McCray
73 A.D.3d 1213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)