People v. Ayala

244 A.D.2d 184, 664 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11376
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ayala. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 A.D.2d 802

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered November 27, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The evidence at the suppression hearing supported the inference that the unidentified apprehending officer heard the same transmission as the testifying officer (see, People v Mims, 88 NY2d 99, 113-114).

The court properly denied defendant’s request for an agency charge “because there was no reasonable view of the evidence supporting the theory that defendant acted solely for the buyer” (People v Brimberry, 237 AD2d 229). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ayala, 244 A.D.2d 184, 664 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 184 (People v. Ayala) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ramirez-Portoreal
666 N.E.2d 207 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Brimberry
237 A.D.2d 229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)