People v. Ayala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ayala

235 A.D.2d 212, 697 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D.2d 212 (People v. Ayala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ayala, 235 A.D.2d 212, 697 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered January 6, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

We find that defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal any pretrial rulings, made in connection with his plea bargain, was voluntary, knowing and intelligent (see, People v White, 228 AD2d 308) and that his claim on appeal that the hearing court erred in denying suppression is therefore unreviewable (People v Powers, 231 AD2d 477), and, in any event, without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered January 6, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

We find that defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal any pretrial rulings, made in connection with his plea bargain, was voluntary, knowing and intelligent (see, People v White, 228 AD2d 308) and that his claim on appeal that the hearing court erred in denying suppression is therefore unreviewable (People v Powers, 231 AD2d 477), and, in any event, without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D.2d 212, 697 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ayala-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack