People v. Austin

134 A.D.3d 583, 20 N.Y.S.3d 891
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Austin. Read the opinion of the Court — 141 A.D.3d 956
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2015·No. 16467 2865/10·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J., at plea; Patricia M. Nunez, J., at sentencing), rendered September 6, 2012, as amended November 19, 2012, convicting defendant of grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

*584 Defendant’s claim that his plea allocution was deficient because the court omitted the word “jury” from its reference to giving up the right to a trial is a claim requiring preservation (see People v Jackson, 123 AD3d 634 [1st Dept 2014], lv denied 25 NY3d 1202 [2015]), and we decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the record establishes the voluntariness of the plea (see People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16-19 [1983]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Renwick, Saxe and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Austin, 134 A.D.3d 583, 20 N.Y.S.3d 891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

134 A.D.3d 583 (People v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Tyrell
4 N.E.3d 346 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)