People v. Austin
This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 4214 (People v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Austin |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 04214 |
| Decided on June 8, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 8, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
709 KA 16-01081
v
RASHAWN C. AUSTIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ALAN WILLIAMS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DANIEL PUNCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Kenneth F. Case, J.), rendered January 6, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his guilty plea of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law
§ 125.20 [1]). We reject defendant's contention that County Court erred in failing to fulfill its statutory obligation to consider whether the circumstances warranted youthful offender treatment (see CPL 720.20 [1]; People v Rudolph, 21 NY3d 497, 499 [2013]). At sentencing, the court denied defendant youthful offender treatment, and attributed the denial to the seriousness of the crime. We conclude that the court's remarks establish that it "made an independent determination" whether to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender (People v Richardson, 128 AD3d 988, 989 [2d Dept 2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 1206 [2015]). Defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence, including the period of postrelease supervision (see People v Blas, 120 AD3d 585, 585 [2d Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1001 [2014]).
Entered: June 8, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 NY Slip Op 4214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-austin-nyappdiv-2018.