People v. Atkinson

65 A.D.3d 1112, 885 N.Y.S.2d 208
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 2009·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), dated August 25, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was clear and convincing evidence to support the County Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender (see People v Fisher, 36 AD3d 880 [2007]; People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404 [2005]; People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from this risk level (see People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515 [2006]; People v Ventura, 24 AD3d 527 [2005]; People v Dexter, 21 AD3d 403 [2005]). Fisher, J.P., Florio, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Atkinson, 65 A.D.3d 1112, 885 N.Y.S.2d 208 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

65 A.D.3d 1112 (People v. Atkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
116 A.D.3d 1017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Navarro
115 A.D.3d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Barclay
107 A.D.3d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Samayoa
96 A.D.3d 1031 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Carleo
82 A.D.3d 1067 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Lynk
74 A.D.3d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)