People v. Ashby

118 A.D.3d 904, 987 N.Y.S.2d 238
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ashby. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 A.D.3d 931

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), imposed February 7, 2011, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, PJ., Skelos, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ashby, 118 A.D.3d 904, 987 N.Y.S.2d 238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

118 A.D.3d 904 (People v. Ashby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)