People v. Arriaza

134 A.D.3d 1080, 21 N.Y.S.3d 635
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2015·No. 2014-08819·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated August 25, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant failed to show, by a preponderance of the evidence (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112 [2011]), his entitlement to a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v Pavia, *1081 121 AD3d 960 [2014]; People v Romero, 113 AD3d 605 [2014]). Accordingly, the County Court properly designated him a level two sex offender.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are not properly before this Court. Leventhal, J.P., Chambers, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Arriaza, 134 A.D.3d 1080, 21 N.Y.S.3d 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

134 A.D.3d 1080 (People v. Arriaza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pavia
121 A.D.3d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Wyatt
89 A.D.3d 112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Romero
113 A.D.3d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)