People v. Armstrong
This text of 772 N.W.2d 363 (People v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Akili Eugene ARMSTRONG, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we *364 are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in People v. Idziak, 484 Mich. 549, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2009).
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v. Idziak, 484 Mich. 549, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
772 N.W.2d 363, 485 Mich. 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-armstrong-mich-2009.