People v. Armstrong
This text of 753 N.W.2d 178 (People v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Richard Rankin ARMSTRONG, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered *179 and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Otsego Circuit Court for a hearing under People v Ginther, 390 Mich. 436, 212 N.W.2d 922 (1973).
In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
753 N.W.2d 178, 482 Mich. 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-armstrong-mich-2008.