People v. Arana

45 A.D.3d 311, 844 N.Y.S.2d 696
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 8, 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), entered on or about December 5, 2006, which denied defendant’s motion to be resentenced pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act, unanimously affirmed.

Following our remand (32 AD3d 305 [2006]), the court properly determined that “substantial justice dictates that the application should be denied” (L 2004, ch 738, § 23). The record establishes that the court based its decision on defendant’s participation in a very extensive drug trafficking enterprise, and that defendant’s nationality was not a factor in the denial of his motion. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Catterson and Kavanagh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Arana, 45 A.D.3d 311, 844 N.Y.S.2d 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

45 A.D.3d 311 (People v. Arana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lebron
46 A.D.3d 389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Rojas
46 A.D.3d 315 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)