People v. Lebron

44 A.D.3d 310, 841 N.Y.S.2d 866
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 2, 2007·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), entered on or about September 19, 2006, which denied defendant’s motion for DNA testing pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a), unanimously affirmed.

CPL 440.30 (1-a), which provides a procedure for convicted defendants to seek DNA testing, is inapplicable to persons who pleaded guilty (see People v Byrdsong, 33 AD3d 175 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 900 [2006]). Since defendant pleaded guilty, he may not avail himself of the provisions of the statute. Contrary to defendant’s argument, this Court, in its previous decision noting the appropriate procedure for defendant to seek DNA testing (Matter of Lebron v Smith, 17 AD3d 195 [2005], lv dismissed 5 NY3d 737 [2005]), did not rule that he is entitled to such testing. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Tom, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lebron, 44 A.D.3d 310, 841 N.Y.S.2d 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

44 A.D.3d 310 (People v. Lebron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. Walsh
S.D. New York, 2025
People v. Foxworth
81 A.D.3d 547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Allen
47 A.D.3d 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)