People v. Anthony

179 A.D.2d 765
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 21, 1992·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in allowing a police officer to testify that he arrested the defendant after a conversation with the victim (see, People v Holt, 67 NY2d 819, 821; see also, People v DuBois, 137 AD2d 706) is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, any error was harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, including the strong identification testimony by the victim and an eyewitness who was acquainted with the defendant (see, People v Mobley, 56 NY2d 584; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Anthony, 179 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

179 A.D.2d 765 (People v. Anthony) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Martin
261 A.D.2d 488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Jones
236 A.D.2d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Singleton
222 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Cosme
203 A.D.2d 375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Williams
193 A.D.2d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)