People v. Anderson

203 A.D.3d 1579, 161 N.Y.S.3d 904, 2022 NY Slip Op 01656
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 N.Y.S.3d 589
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 2022·No. 158 KA 19-00069·Published

Opinion

People v Anderson (2022 NY Slip Op 01656)
People v Anderson
2022 NY Slip Op 01656
Decided on March 11, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 11, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

158 KA 19-00069

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

TERRANCE R. ANDERSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (BRIDGET L. FIELD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (DEREK HARNSBERGER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Charles A. Schiano, Jr., J.), rendered March 7, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon a jury verdict of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, that part of the omnibus motion seeking to suppress physical evidence is granted, the indictment against defendant is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for proceedings pursuant to CPL 470.45.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [1] [b]; [3]). As we previously determined on the appeal of a codefendant, Supreme Court erred in denying that part of the omnibus motion seeking to suppress physical evidence seized by the police (see People v Fitts, 188 AD3d 1676, 1677-1678 [4th Dept 2020]). We therefore reverse the judgment, grant that part of the motion, and dismiss the indictment against defendant.

Entered: March 11, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Anderson, 203 A.D.3d 1579, 161 N.Y.S.3d 904, 2022 NY Slip Op 01656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

203 A.D.3d 1579 (People v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Boatwright
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026