People v. Anderson

2019 NY Slip Op 6896
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 A.D.3d 1407
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 2019·No. 790 KA 18-01539·Published

Opinion

People v Anderson (2019 NY Slip Op 06896)
People v Anderson
2019 NY Slip Op 06896
Decided on September 27, 2019
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 27, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

790 KA 18-01539

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ANTONIO M. ANDERSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)


DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JOSEPH G. FRAZIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

CAROLINE A. WOJTASZEK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), rendered May 1, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals, in appeal No. 1, from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]). In appeal No. 2, he appeals from a judgment convicting him, also upon his guilty plea, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (§ 220.31). Contrary to defendant's contention in both appeals, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), and those valid waivers foreclose his challenge to the severity of the sentences (see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]).

Entered: September 27, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Anderson, 2019 NY Slip Op 6896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

2019 NY Slip Op 6896 (People v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lococo
699 N.E.2d 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)