People v. Anderson

2018 NY Slip Op 5479
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 A.D.3d 988
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 25, 2018·No. 2015-10258·Published

Opinion

People v Anderson (2018 NY Slip Op 05479)
People v Anderson
2018 NY Slip Op 05479
Decided on July 25, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 25, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

2015-10258
(Ind. No. 23/15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Monica Anderson, appellant.


Steven A. Feldman, Uniondale, NY (Arza Feldman of counsel), for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Stephen L. Greller, J.), rendered September 29, 2015, convicting her of burglary in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's request, on the day of sentencing, for new counsel, since the defendant failed to make the requisite specific factual allegations of serious complaints about counsel (see People v Porto, 16 NY3d 93, 100; People v Medina, 44 NY2d 199, 207).

The County Court also providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the defendant's oral application to the court to withdraw her plea of guilty (see People v Seeber, 4 NY3d 780, 781; People v Hecht, 142 AD3d 676).

The defendant's contention that she was deprived of the opportunity to address the court during sentencing in violation of CPL 380.50 is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Green, 54 NY2d 878, 880; People v Crosby, 133 AD3d 681, 682) and, in any event, without merit (see People v McClain, 35 NY2d 483, 491-492; People v Crosby, 133 AD3d at 682; People v McCant, 79 AD3d 908).

DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Anderson, 2018 NY Slip Op 5479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 5479 (People v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seeber
826 N.E.2d 797 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
People v. Porto
942 N.E.2d 283 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Crosby
133 A.D.3d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Hecht
142 A.D.3d 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. McClain
323 N.E.2d 685 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Green
429 N.E.2d 415 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. McCant
79 A.D.3d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)