People v. Anderson

118 A.D.2d 488, 500 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54355
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin F. Klein, J.), rendered July 20, 1983, after jury trial, convicting defendant of attempted robbery in the first degree and imposing a prison term of 2Vs to 7 years, unanimously reversed, on the law, the judgment of conviction is vacated and a new trial ordered.

The Trial Judge denied defendant’s challenge for cause of a prospective 77-year-old juror. Judiciary Law § 510 (2) provides that in order to qualify as a juror a person must be "less than seventy-six and not less than eighteen years of age”.

CPL 270.20 (1) (a) authorizes a challenge for cause on the ground that the prospective juror does not have the qualifications required by the Judiciary Law.

Defendant utilized a peremptory challenge to the 77-year-old prospective juror and exhausted his peremptory challenges before the jury selection was complete. The People commendably concede that the court’s failure to excuse the prospective juror for cause denied defendant a fair trial and constituted reversible error (People v Foster, 100 AD2d 200, 206, mod on other grounds 64 NY2d 1144).

Accordingly, we are ordering a new trial. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Carro, Fein and Rosenberger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Anderson, 118 A.D.2d 488, 500 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

118 A.D.2d 488 (People v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mandala
195 A.D.2d 574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)