People v. Alvarado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Alvarado

262 A.D.2d 710, 694 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6534

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 262 A.D.2d 710 (People v. Alvarado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Alvarado, 262 A.D.2d 710, 694 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6534 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Peters, J.

Appeal [711]*711from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered February 9, 1998, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

On July 3, 1995 at Gouverneur Correctional Facility in St. Lawrence County, a number of Hispanic inmates severely beat an African-American inmate, leaving him unconscious. Defendant and Jose Torres (see, People v Torres, 258 AD2d 824) were later identified to be among the inmates involved in the incident. Both defendant and Torres were ultimately indicted for assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Notably, however, no count of the indictment was based upon an “acting in concert” theory (see, People v Dlugash, 41 NY2d 725, 731). During their joint trial, a correction officer testified that he saw defendant striking the victim with a 10-pound free weight in the back of the head. Testimony also revealed that Torres hit the victim from behind with a weight bar. Defendant was found guilty of all counts and now asserts that the trial evidence was legally insufficient and that the jury verdict was against the weight of the credible evidence.

Upon our review, we find meritorious defendant’s contention that the trial evidence was legally insufficient to support the jury’s determination that his conduct was the direct cause of the victim’s injury (see, People v Darrow, 260 AD2d 928). While we are constrained by People v Darrow (supra) to conclude that the conviction of assault in the first degree cannot stand, we remain authorized to modify the judgment (see, CPL 470.15 [2] [a]) upon our conclusion that, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, it was sufficient to establish the lesser included offense of attempted assault in the first degree (see, CPL 1.20 [37]; Penal Law § 110.00; People v Santos, 213 AD2d 302, affd 86 NY2d 869).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing defendant’s conviction of the crime of assault in the first degree to the crime of attempted assault in the first degree; matter remitted to the County Court of St. Lawrence County for resentencing on that count only; and, as so modified, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peters, J.

Appeal [711]*711from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered February 9, 1998, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

On July 3, 1995 at Gouverneur Correctional Facility in St. Lawrence County, a number of Hispanic inmates severely beat an African-American inmate, leaving him unconscious. Defendant and Jose Torres (see, People v Torres, 258 AD2d 824) were later identified to be among the inmates involved in the incident. Both defendant and Torres were ultimately indicted for assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Notably, however, no count of the indictment was based upon an “acting in concert” theory (see, People v Dlugash, 41 NY2d 725, 731). During their joint trial, a correction officer testified that he saw defendant striking the victim with a 10-pound free weight in the back of the head. Testimony also revealed that Torres hit the victim from behind with a weight bar. Defendant was found guilty of all counts and now asserts that the trial evidence was legally insufficient and that the jury verdict was against the weight of the credible evidence.

Upon our review, we find meritorious defendant’s contention that the trial evidence was legally insufficient to support the jury’s determination that his conduct was the direct cause of the victim’s injury (see, People v Darrow, 260 AD2d 928). While we are constrained by People v Darrow (supra) to conclude that the conviction of assault in the first degree cannot stand, we remain authorized to modify the judgment (see, CPL 470.15 [2] [a]) upon our conclusion that, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, it was sufficient to establish the lesser included offense of attempted assault in the first degree (see, CPL 1.20 [37]; Penal Law § 110.00; People v Santos, 213 AD2d 302, affd 86 NY2d 869).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing defendant’s conviction of the crime of assault in the first degree to the crime of attempted assault in the first degree; matter remitted to the County Court of St. Lawrence County for resentencing on that count only; and, as so modified, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 710, 694 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alvarado-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack