People v. Allah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Allah

196 A.D.2d 505, 601 N.Y.S.2d 844

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 2, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 196 A.D.2d 505 (People v. Allah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Allah, 196 A.D.2d 505, 601 N.Y.S.2d 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered June 22, 1992, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s pro se motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Dickerson, 163 AD2d 610). Moreover, we find no merit to the defendant’s contention that the court should have appointed new counsel or that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Niaze, 193 AD2d 629; People v Smith, 192 AD2d 732). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered June 22, 1992, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s pro se motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Dickerson, 163 AD2d 610). Moreover, we find no merit to the defendant’s contention that the court should have appointed new counsel or that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Niaze, 193 AD2d 629; People v Smith, 192 AD2d 732). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.D.2d 505, 601 N.Y.S.2d 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-allah-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack