People v. Allah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Allah

187 A.D.2d 600, 591 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12963

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 187 A.D.2d 600 (People v. Allah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Allah, 187 A.D.2d 600, 591 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12963 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a [601]*601judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered August 20, 1990, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a [601]*601judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered August 20, 1990, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D.2d 600, 591 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-allah-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack