People v. Ahmed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ahmed

269 A.D.2d 458, 702 N.Y.S.2d 888, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1339

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 14, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered June 2, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions, including that the Supreme Court improperly charged the jurors regarding their participation in the deliberation process, are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Green, 202 AD2d 186; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245) and, in any event, without merit. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered June 2, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions, including that the Supreme Court improperly charged the jurors regarding their participation in the deliberation process, are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Green, 202 AD2d 186; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245) and, in any event, without merit. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

People v. Ahmed, 269 A.D.2d 458, 702 N.Y.S.2d 888, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

269 A.D.2d 458 (People v. Ahmed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related