People v. Adams

240 A.D.2d 673, 659 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6787
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Adams. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 A.D.2d 1093

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered May 31, 1995, as amended June 27, 1995, convicting him of assault in the second degree, resisting arrest, attempted robbery in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Moreover, the record does not reflect that the defendant was deprived of effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146). Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Florio and Mc-Ginity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Adams, 240 A.D.2d 673, 659 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 673 (People v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)