People v. Adams

110 A.D.2d 772, 488 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48673
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[773]*773A review of the record discloses that a rational fact finder could readily have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of all crimes charged (Jackson v Virginia, 443 US 307, 319). Furthermore, defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is meritless. Defendant failed to demonstrate that his attorney’s actions “ ‘resulted in actual and substantial disadvantage to the course of his defense’ ” (People v Morris, 100 AD2d 630, 631, affd 64 NY2d 803, quoting from Washington v Strickland, 693 F2d 1243, 1262, revd on other grounds 466 US 668, 104 S Ct 2052).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Adams, 110 A.D.2d 772, 488 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

110 A.D.2d 772 (People v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sneed
116 A.D.2d 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)