People v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Adams

92 A.D.2d 939, 460 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17350

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.D.2d 939 (People v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Adams, 92 A.D.2d 939, 460 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17350 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered January 7, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Defendant was sent a copy of counsel’s brief and asked whether he wanted any issues raised. No response was received. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered January 7, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Defendant was sent a copy of counsel’s brief and asked whether he wanted any issues raised. No response was received. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.2d 939, 460 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-adams-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack